If you are a British gambler, you quite easy to just cheat the system and continue playing regardless of prior self-exclusions. What did BBC’s so-called investigates find out? We are going to tell you all about it! 4b2t2h
Mere typos can make a difference 3o4w1c
According to BBC’s article, the biggest problem with Gamstop would be its rigid attention to detail. When a person s to Gamstop, they will be tasked with leaving all their personal information, including name, address, email, and so on. Then, when trying to sign up to playing.
Reactions to the flaws 71y22
Adam Bradford, son of a gambling addict, interviewed in the BBC news story went on to call such flaws scandalous, adding that the hundreds of thousands of betting addicts in the UK are actually not being protected. Ms Palmer, the chief executive of Gamstop, on the other, had this to say: “We are taking on board the and we are looking to improve the scheme”. The UK Gambling Commission has since also weighed in on the story, saying that it is looking to add tougher ID checks in the future o ensure that Gamstop will work better.
Not all casinos are ed to Gamstop 211i4p
A key detail to consider is the share number of time. These sites are not effected by the self-exclusion scheme at all, and any gambler can just visit these websites and play like before. To see the Poker Player Newspaper report on non-Gamstop casinos visit https://www.pokerplayernewspaper.com/casinos-not-on-gamstop/. For Gamstop to be a serious alternative, it should include unlicenced casino sites as well. There are other services out there, like Gamban or BetBlocker, that covers most gambling sites out there. A combination of the services would definitely have the highest success rate.
Our take 5c5y6h
We can understand that online casinos ever even dream of pulling it off?
